Marquardt Company v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JACK R. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (board) granting summary judgment in fa*1574vor of an administrative contracting officer’s determination that the sale of a Government contractor’s stock by one third party to another does not entitle the contractor (1) to writeup its depreciable assets to reflect the price paid for the stock and (2) to charge depreciation thereon to the Government. Technically, the appeal is also from the board’s decision denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration. We affirm.
Background
All of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sundstrand Turbo, a Division of Sundstrand Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hines v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Riverside Research Institute v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Heagy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Metzger, Shadyac & Schwarz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- MOTHER FRANCES HOSP. OF TYLER, TEXAS v. ShalalaDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.