Metzger, Shadyac & Schwarz v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs are members of the law firm Metzger, Shadyac & Schwarz (“Metzger”). They instituted action in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1982) for an alleged breach of contract by defendant. Plaintiffs seek to recover damages in the amount of $46,562.42 owed to them as attorney fees by a non-party, Environment Consultants Inc. (ECI). The case is pres*603ently before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Two issues are presented for consideration. The first is whether an express contract existed between Metzger and the Fish and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Fincke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Laura Hebah, Administratrix, in the Matter of the Estate of Robert Hebah, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Estate of Bogley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schuerman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- American Lifestyle Homes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Miles Farm Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Pereira v. CoganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.