Legal Opinion

Heagy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 20, 1987No. 449-83CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This action is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Heagy alleges in his complaint that defendant, acting through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), breached an agreement arising out of HUD’s guarantee of a mortgage loan to Heagy; that HUD’s conduct was in violation of the equal protection and due process clauses of the fifth and fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution and that its failure to postpone foreclosure was arbitrary and capricious. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crocker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. Ashgar v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Siegal v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Synernet Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API