Legal Opinion

Guerin v. Norton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 5, 1974PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cttrtam.

This appeal is ancillary to a welfare department fair hearing proceeding wherein subpoenas were issued by the plaintiff’s counsel directing the welfare commissioner and two of his subordinates to appear as witnesses at that hearing. Neither the welfare commissioner nor his subordinates appeared as directed. Thereafter, the plaintiff brought an application to the Superior Court seeking a citation to compel them to appear in court and answer questions pursuant to the previously issued subpoenas. Upon the issuance of a citation by the court, the defendants filed a plea in abatement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  2. Howarth v. NorthcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  3. Hoberman v. Lake of Isles, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Batesville v. BallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  5. Morse v. RankinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. MalkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. STRORINEY v. Crescent Lake Tax DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Sillman v. SillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. Chrysler Credit Corporation v. Fairfield Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. State v. GrottonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API