Legal Opinion

Chrysler Credit Corporation v. Fairfield Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 8, 1980PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This appeal arises out of an order imposing sanctions for failure to comply with a discovery order. The plaintiff, Chrysler Credit Corporation (hereinafter Chrysler Credit), sued the defendant Fairfield Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (hereinafter Fairfield) on a debt and a security interest in the form of a floor plan loan account. The defendant Morris Goldman was sued as garnishee of and assignee from the defendant Fairfield. Goldman moved to dismiss the complaint against him,1 alleging lack of personal jurisdiction over him. When this motion was heard, the plaintiff requested and received a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. James Allen Budde v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., D/B/A Kentron Hawaii, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. Prevedini v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Gores v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  4. H. L. Moore Drug Exchange, Inc. v. Smith, Kline & French LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. Guerin v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. MalkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API