Legal Opinion
Hoberman v. Lake of Isles, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 4, 1952PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage. The answer denied the execution of the mortgage and alleged that the loan purporting to be secured had not been made. Judgment was entered for the defendants. Thereafter the plaintiff filed his motion for a new trial pursuant to Practice Book, § 229. The court found that material testimony relating to the execution of the mortgage given by the defendant Girden on the .trial of the case was false. It concluded that for that reason the judgment must be opened and a new trial had in order to avoid injustice or judicial error and entered an order…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Ferguson v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Marcil v. A. H. Merriman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Banca Commerciale Italiana Trust Co. v. Westchester Artistic Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Sasso v. AleshinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. FaheySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Freccia v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.