Legal Opinion

Howarth v. Northcott

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 4, 1965PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

In December, 1960, the plaintiff applied for a writ of habeas corpus to determine the custody of her two minor children, who, she alleged, were then being unlawfully held by the defendant, their father, the plaintiff’s divorced husband. The writ of habeas corpus has long been used and approved to test the right to custody of a minor child. Dunham v. Dunham, 97 Conn. 440, 443, 117 A. 504. Indeed, it is the only procedure, other than actions for divorce or legal separation, by which the Superior Court has original jurisdiction over custody of minor children. Adamsen v. Adamsen, 151 Conn. 172,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kelsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  2. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  3. Labella v. LabellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Pugh v. PughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Wojculewicz v. CummingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. McGaffin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. State v. RobersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Prevedini v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API