Legal Opinion
State v. Malkowski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 25, 1983No. 10355PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cubiam.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether the state may appeal from a denial without prejudice of its plea in abatement. The state instituted the present proceedings as a plaintiff by bringing a civil action against the defendant, Ethel Malkowski, administratrix of the estate of Walter Malkowski, to obtain reimbursement in the amount of $8500 for care and treatment that Walter Malkowski received as a patient at Connecticut Valley Hospital. In that civil action, the defendant filed a counterclaim, alleging that Walter Malkow-ski’s death was caused by the negligence of state…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- East Side Civic Assn. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Woodmont Ass'n v. Town of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Vincenzo v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.