Legal Opinion

State v. Grotton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 15, 1980PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Per curiam

This motion to reargue concerns the appealability of an order of the trial court relating to the taking of nontestimonial evidence under Practice Book, 1978, §§ 775, 776 and 778. In view of the frequency with which issues concerning appealability arise, we take this opportunity to clarify the prevailing law in this regard.

The facts pertinent to our inquiry are as follows. The defendant James W. Grotton was, on October 21, 1979, arrested and charged by information with the crime of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, in violation of General Statutes § 19-480a (a). No one can be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. State v. GuertinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. State v. EasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Buckley v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API