Morse v. Rankin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Suit for a foreclosure; brought to the Superior Court in Litchfield County. Plea in abatement overruled; facts found and judgment for the plaintiff. Appeal by the defendant. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
This suit was brought by a plaintiff residing out of this state, and no bond for the prosecution of the suit was given when the writ was issued, and the defendant pleaded that fact in abatement of the suit. The Superior Court allowed the plaintiff to give bond in court and proceeded to hear the case. Judgment having been rendered for the plaintiff, the defendant brings the case before this court by appeal, assigning as one of the errors the allowing of the plaintiff to file a bond in court and the holding the writ to be good after the bond was so filed.
The statute (Gen. Statutes, p. 397, §…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ives v. FinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
- Eno v. FrisbieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1811
- Ripley v. Merchatns' National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
- Hurd v. HullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1793
3Cited by20 opinions
- Styles v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Sheehan v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Banca Commerciale Italiana Trust Co. v. Westchester Artistic Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Franchi v. Farmholme, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.