Legal Opinion

Baier v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2000No. 990310PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Harold Baier appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Workers Compensation Bureau order denying his reapplication for benefits. Concluding the doctrine of administrative res judicata barred the Bureau from relying upon Baier’s termination from employment to deny wage loss benefits, we reverse and remand.

I

[¶ 2] While working for Interstate Brands Corporation (“Interstate”) as a dough mixer, Baier suffered work-related injuries to his right shoulder and his back in 1993 and 1995, respectively. The Bureau accepted claims and paid benefits for those injuries.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. B.H. v. K.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Tooley v. AlmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cridland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Saakian v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Lende v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gronfur v. North Dakota Workers Compensation FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Lesmeister v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ziesch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hall v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Landrum v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API