Cridland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Norma Cridland appealed a judgment affirming a workers compensation bureau order apportioning benefits previously paid her and requiring her to repay more than $24,-000. Cridland’s appeal raises issues about whether a Bureau order awarding her benefits precludes the Bureau from later apportioning those benefits between her work injury and a noncompensable injury. We hold, in the absence of new evidence or a change in medical condition, the Bureau’s order awarding Cridland benefits for her work injury, entered with knowledge of the noncompensa-ble injury and after a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Wetch v. WetchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Igal v. Brightstar Information Technology Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Riverwood Commercial Park, L.L.C. v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Gregory v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Saakian v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- McCarty v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.