Legal Opinion
B.H. v. K.D.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1993No. Civ. No. 920383PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
K.D. (Kelly, a pseudonym) and D.D. (Dean, a pseudonym) appeal from two orders entered by the District Court for Burleigh County in an action initiated by B.H. (Barry, a pseudonym) to determine the paternity of A.D. (Anna, a pseudonym). One order denied Kelly and Dean’s motion for summary judgment. The other order compelled Kelly and Anna to undergo blood tests. We exercise supervision and reverse the orders.
In January 1991, Kelly and Dean were engaged to be married. Anna was conceived in March 1991. At that time, Kelly had sexual relations with both Dean and Barry. Although…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Weidenbacher v. DuclosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Mitchell v. SanbornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Mann v. ND Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- North Dakota Commission on Medical Competency v. RacekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.