Landrum v. Workforce Safety & Insurance Fund

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Richard Landrum appealed a district court judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) denying further benefits. We affirm, concluding that administrative res judicata did not bar WSI from denying further benefits and that a reasoning mind reasonably could have concluded that Landrum failed to prove his work injury was a substantial, contributing factor to his headaches and vision problems.

I

[¶ 2] In 1990, while working in New England, Landrum was struck in the nose by a sliding metal meat hook, resulting in a fractured nose and a…