Legal Opinion
Tooley v. Alm
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1994No. Civ. 930358PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
The plaintiff in this action, Darrell Tooley, seeks certification of a class action in order to compel the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau to notify and screen claimants for potential permanent partial impairment awards. Tooley appeals from a judgment dismissing his action for a declaratory judgment and a writ of mandamus against the bureau and its executive director. We hold Tooley has not shown a clear legal right to the relief requested and has an adequate legal remedy which has not been exhausted. We therefore affirm the district court judgment.
I
On September 3,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Beckler v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CarpenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Shark Bros., Inc. v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Medcenter One, Inc. v. North Dakota State Board of PharmacyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Diegel v. City of West FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Medical Arts Clinic, P.C. v. Franciscan Initiatives, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Thompson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Feist v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.