Legal Opinion

Saakian v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1998No. Civil 980122PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Valeriy Saakian appealed from a judgment affirming a Workers Compensation Bureau order denying him disability benefits. We conclude Saakian had adequate notice his entitlement to disability benefits was an issue to be determined at the administrative hearing on compensability of his claim. We also conclude the Bureau’s finding Saakian was not disabled when it initially dismissed his claim is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] During the summer of 1996, Saakian was employed as a car washer by Bismarck Transportation, Inc., doing business as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Flink v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cridland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Feist v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sprunk v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Morrell v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Vernon v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Unser v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bruns v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Siewert v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API