Saakian v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Valeriy Saakian appealed from a judgment affirming a Workers Compensation Bureau order denying him disability benefits. We conclude Saakian had adequate notice his entitlement to disability benefits was an issue to be determined at the administrative hearing on compensability of his claim. We also conclude the Bureau’s finding Saakian was not disabled when it initially dismissed his claim is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] During the summer of 1996, Saakian was employed as a car washer by Bismarck Transportation, Inc., doing business as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Flink v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Cridland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Feist v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Sprunk v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Morrell v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Vernon v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Unser v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Bruns v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Siewert v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.