Ziesch v. Workforce Safety & Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Karen Ziesch has appealed from a judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) denying further disability benefits. We affirm, concluding that WSI’s issuance of a lump sum disability award did not violate Ziesch’s right to due process and that WSI was not barred by the doctrine of administrative res judicata from denying further disability benefits.
I
[¶ 2] Ziesch injured her back at work in 1995 and filed a claim for workers compensation benefits. Ziesch received disability benefits until September 9, 1997, when WSI determined she was able to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Beckler v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Cridland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Frohlich v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Nemec v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- McCarty v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Swenson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Genter v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Thompson v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Stenvold v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Landrum v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.