Legal Opinion

Ziesch v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2006No. 20050256PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Karen Ziesch has appealed from a judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) denying further disability benefits. We affirm, concluding that WSI’s issuance of a lump sum disability award did not violate Ziesch’s right to due process and that WSI was not barred by the doctrine of administrative res judicata from denying further disability benefits.

I

[¶ 2] Ziesch injured her back at work in 1995 and filed a claim for workers compensation benefits. Ziesch received disability benefits until September 9, 1997, when WSI determined she was able to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Beckler v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cridland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Frohlich v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Nemec v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. McCarty v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Swenson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Genter v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Stenvold v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Landrum v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API