Legal Opinion

Neefus v. Neefus

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 7, 1941No. 32,672PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This is an action for breach of a defendant’s redelivery bond in a replevin action. The sureties appeal from an order striking their answers as sham and frivolous.

In the replevin action plaintiff sued the defendant Ralph L. Neefus to recover possession of certain personal property. The latter was permitted to retain the physical custody of the property under a receipt which he gave the sheriff. Then he gave a redelivery bond with the defendants Hartwig and McCormick as sureties. The bond is in the penal sum of $1,500 and is conditioned for the delivery of the replevied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Independent School District v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. National Surety Co. v. BecklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Schlozer v. HeckerothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Hasse v. Victoria Co-Operative Creamery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kirk v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Watkins Products, Inc. v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  4. Independent School District No. 24 v. WeinmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API