Legal Opinion
Watkins Products, Inc. v. Butterfield
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 8, 1966No. 39890PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court denying appellants’ alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
On May 14, 1962, Watkins Products, Inc., and Cecil P. Butterfield entered an agreement contemplating the sale of Watkins’ products to Butterfield for resale by him to the public. On May 15, 1962, appellants, Ambrose Robak and Doris Robak, executed a document attached to this agreement reading in part as follows:
“In consideration of the execution of the foregoing agreement by Watkins Products, Inc., which we have read or heard read, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. BecklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Schlozer v. HeckerothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Neefus v. NeefusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
3Cited by11 opinions
- Midway National Bank v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Dayton Development Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Gilman Financial Services, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- State Bank of Cologne v. SchruppCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- MacKenzie v. Summit National Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- First National Bank v. International MacHines Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.