Legal Opinion

Hasse v. Victoria Co-Operative Creamery Assn.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 1940No. 32,476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Appeal from a judgment entered on the pleadings after plaintiff’s reply was stricken as sham and frivolous.

The complaint alleges negligence by defendant in the maintenance of its premises, a creamery, and asks damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff while lawfully thereon. The answer admits the injuries, denies negligence on its part, and alleges contributory negligence and assumption of risk by plaintiff. It also alleges that plaintiff was engaged in the performance - of his duties as an employe of defendant at the time he was injured and that his injuries arose…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. George Benz & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. State ex rel. Engelhard v. WeberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Sheets v. RamerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Independent School District v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Bank of Richards v. SheasgreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kirk v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. OzmunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Neefus v. NeefusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API