Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Welch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1942No. 33,169PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This is an appeal from the judgment entered by the clerk of the district court without further order after the court ordered that the answer and counterclaim be stricken as sham and that plaintiff have judgment against defendant as by default of an answer.

The action is for breach of a contract dated August 9, 1940, by the terms of which plaintiff, as vendor, agreed to sell and convey to defendant, as vendee, and the latter agreed to buy, certain real property. As consideration therefor, defendant agreed to pay the sum of $844.50, to assume the mortgage on the premises, on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schwab v. BaremoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Schley v. . FryerNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Engel v. MahlenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. John v. TimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Coles v. ShepardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Lawrence Zirinsky v. James L. Sheehan, John D. Sheehan and Brooklyn Center Industrial Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. Raymond v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Pipe Welding Supply Co. Inc. v. Gas Atmospheres, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API