Legal Opinion
Independent School District No. 24 v. Weinmann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 21, 1955No. 36,389, 36,392PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Christianson, Justice.
Action was brought by plaintiff, as obligee, on a contractor’s bid bond executed by defendants, Oren M. Weinmann, as principal, and St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company, as surety. Plaintiff’s initial motion to strike defendants’ answers as sham and frivolous was denied by the court. Thereafter plaintiff moved for summary judgment against both defendants and its motion was granted. Defendant St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company, hereinafter referred to as Mercury, then amended its answer to cross claim against defendant Weinmann for indemnification for all sums adjudged…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wheaton Building & Lumber Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- St. Nicholas Church v. KroppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Follansbee v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Palo and Dodini v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Olson v. ShephardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farmers Union Federated Cooperative Shipping Association, a Corporation v. Charles McChesneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Hiedeman v. HiedemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Chas. H. Tompkins Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
- Elk River Concrete Products Co. v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Den Mar Construction Co. v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.