Legal Opinion
Schlozer v. Heckeroth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 8, 1928No. Nos. 26,585, 26,586, 26,587, 26,588PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
These four actions were tried together. They rest upon the same facts, present the same questions, and are submitted upon the same record and briefs. The plaintiffs are holders of bonds issued by the United States Cereal Company. The bonds were secured by a trust deed executed by the cereal company to the St. Paul Trust & Savings Bank as trustee, and also by a guaranty printed thereon bearing the signatures of 20 directors of the cereal company. The names of the guarantors are not given in the body of the instrument and appear only in the signatures thereto. The guaranty recites,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hanover National Bank v. American Dock & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- White v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Farmers State Bank v. HaunWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- First National Bank v. DrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fred R. Dunahugh v. Environmental Systems Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Melvyn L. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Watkins Products, Inc. v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Neefus v. NeefusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- First Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Nicollet Syndicate, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934