Legal Opinion

Radio Station WMFR, Inc. v. Eitel-McCullough, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1950No. 669PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

If the findings of fact are supported by the evidence they are as conclusive as the verdict of a jury and are not subject to review. Matthews v. Fry, 143 N.C. 384, 55 S.E. 787; Cox v. Boyden, 175 N.C. 368, 95 S.E. 548; Tyer v. Lumber Co., 188 N.C. 268, 124 S.E. 305; Tinker v. Rice Motors, Inc., 198 N.C. 73, 150 S.E. 701; Lumber Co. v. Finance Co., 204 N.C. 285, 168 S.E. 219; Brown v. Coal Co., 208 N.C. 50, 178 S.E. 858. Eut this principle does not preclude the review of inferences or conclusions of law. Power Co. v. Moses, 191 N.C. 744, 133 S.E. 5.

In the case at bar the objection made was not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Matthews v. Fry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Cape Fear Railways, Inc. v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Roark v. American Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  5. J. B. Blades Lumber Co. v. Finance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Putnam v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Robert M. Harris v. Deere and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  4. Lambert v. SchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Stafford v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API