Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. ■ The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moody
The plaintiff in error, a citizen of Pennsylvania, brought an action in the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been incurred in Golorado through the negligence of the defendant, against the defendant in error, a corporation created by the laws of the State of Iowa, and, therefore, for jurisdictional purposes, a citizen of that State. The return upon the writ shows a service “on Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railway Company, a corporation which is doing business in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ... by giving a…
2Cited by420 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- BNSF Ry. Co. v. TyrrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
415 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.