Legal Opinion

J. B. Blades Lumber Co. v. Finance Co. of America

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdaMs, J.

We are concerned not so much with the affidavits as with the court’s findings of fact based upon the affidavits; and as the findings are supported by the evidence they are as conclusive as the verdict of a jury and are not subject to review. Matthews v. Fry, 143 N. C., 384; Cox v. Boyden, 175 N. C., 368; Tyer v. Lumber Co., 188 N. C., 268; Tinker v. Rice Motors, Inc., 198 N. C., 73.

The plaintiff is a domestic and the defendant a foreign corporation. The plaintiff undertook to bring the defendant into court by the service of process upon F. J. Miller. The question is whether the pretended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Fry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Whitehurst v. . KerrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Moore Falk v. . the Freeman's National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Tyer v. J. B. Blades Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Tinker v. . Rice Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Lambert v. SchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Radio Station WMFR, Inc. v. Eitel-McCullough, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Ryan v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. McDonald Service Co. v. People's National Bank of Rock HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API