Legal Opinion

Cape Fear Railways, Inc. v. Cobb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 28, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The plaintiff, in limine, moved to dismiss the appeal as fragmentary in that it is from a refusal to dismiss the action for defective service of process, and relies upon the following cases as controlling authorities for its position. Comrs. v. Scales, 171 N. C., p. 527; Clements v. R. R., 179 N. C., 225; Capps v. R. R., 182 N. C., 758.

Plaintiff’s motion must be denied. The appeal, it will be noted, is from an order overruling a motion to dismiss, not upon the ground of irregular or defective service of summons, but for an alleged failure of any valid service of process at all, resulting in a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Commercial Mutual Accident Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Currie v. Golconda Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Whitehurst v. . KerrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Clements v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Robert M. Harris v. Deere and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  2. Radio Station WMFR, Inc. v. Eitel-McCullough, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Denton v. . VassiliadesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Ruark v. Virginia Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Ivy River Land & Timber Co. v. National Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API