Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Schell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1952No. 317PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBakNhill, J.

Finding of Fact No. 2 (No. 4 in the judgment) quoted in the above statement of facts, contains the decisive facts in this case. There the judge details the nature and extent of the activities of the corporate defendant within this State. Defendant Walker is the local agent or representative through whom the corporation acts in furtherance of the objectives there outlined. Is he a local agent within the meaning of G.S. 1-97, upon whom process may be served, so as to subject the corporate defendant to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State ? This is the one question posed for decision on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Spartan Equipment Co. v. Air Placement Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Robert M. Harris v. Deere and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  3. Painter v. Home Finance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Abney Mills v. Tri-State Motor Transit CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Bryson v. Northlake HiltonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API