Hamaker v. Keating
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from "an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing to confirm a sale of real estate. James C. Rives, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The respondents move the court to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that no transcript of the record on appeal has been filed, and that the time allowed therefor has expired.
On January 28, 1910, the superior court made an order refusing to confirm the sale of the real property of the estate, theretofore made and reported to the court for confirmation by certain persons claiming to act as trustees. The order was entered by the clerk on the day on which it was made. On February 5, 1910, Hamaker, the purchaser at said sale, filed a notice of appeal from said order. The notice of motion to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mallory v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Mullally v. Irish-American Benevolent SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Wall v. HealdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Forni v. YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Biagi v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Magee v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Cornell University Medical College v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Title Ins. & Tr. Co. v. California Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Sterling Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.