Mitchell v. California & Oregon Steamship Co.
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Thos. F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal by defendant from what is claimed to be two orders of court, one granting the motion of plaintiff to vacate and set aside an order made by the court extending the time of defendant to serve its statement on motion for a new trial, and the other denying the motion of defendant to be relieved, under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, from the objection of plaintiff to the settlement of the proposed statement on motion for a new trial on the ground that it had not been served within time. Both these orders were embraced within a single minute order…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by17 opinions
- Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Carr v. SternCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Title Ins. & Tr. Co. v. California Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Jaques v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Ebner v. SteffansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.