Legal Opinion

Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1978No. 7720SC545PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The sole question for consideration on this appeal is whether the trial judge properly entered summary judgment for defendant. Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56, summary judgment is proper where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Koontz v. City of Winston-Salem, 280 N.C. 513, 186 S.E. 2d 897, rehearing denied, 281 N.C. 516, --- S.E. 2d --- (1972). In a negligence action, summary judgment for defendant is proper where the evidence fails to establish negligence on the part of defendant, establishes contributory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Bogle v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Lambert v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Floyd v. NashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Lambert v. Duke Power CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Hahne v. HanzelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Livingston v. ADAMS & FOUTS, PLLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API