Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Duke Power Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1977No. 7626SC585PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The sole question for consideration on this appeal is whether the trial judge properly entered summary judgment for defendant. Upon a motion for summary judgment, the court does not attempt to resolve issues of fact but to determine whether there is a genuine issue of material fact to be tried. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, 286 N.C. 24, 209 S.E. 2d 795 (1974); Reavis v. Campbell, 27 N.C. App. 231, 218 S.E. 2d 873 (1975). The moving party must make it perfectly clear that he was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Builders Supply Co. v. Eastern Associates, 24 N.C. App. 533, 211…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Bogle v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Floyd v. NashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Shook Builders Supply Co. v. Eastern Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Reavis v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Hale v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Partin v. Carolina Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Gore v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Lambert v. Duke Power CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API