Lambert v. Duke Power Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
The sole question for consideration on this appeal is whether the trial judge properly entered summary judgment for defendant. Upon a motion for summary judgment, the court does not attempt to resolve issues of fact but to determine whether there is a genuine issue of material fact to be tried. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, 286 N.C. 24, 209 S.E. 2d 795 (1974); Reavis v. Campbell, 27 N.C. App. 231, 218 S.E. 2d 873 (1975). The moving party must make it perfectly clear that he was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Builders Supply Co. v. Eastern Associates, 24 N.C. App. 533, 211…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Bogle v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Floyd v. NashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Shook Builders Supply Co. v. Eastern Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Reavis v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Hale v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Partin v. Carolina Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Gore v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Lambert v. Duke Power CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.