Legal Opinion

Bogle v. Duke Power Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1975No. 7525SC505PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

We hold that the trial court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56, summary judgment is proper where there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact and a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Koontz v. City of Winston-Salem, 280 N.C. 513, 186 S.E. 2d 897 (1972), rehearing denied, 281 N.C. 516 (1972) ; Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971). In an action for wrongful death predicated on negligence, summary judgment for defendant is correct where the evidence fails to establish negligence on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Rosser v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. McBrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Ford v. Peaches Entertainment Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Aversa v. Public Service Elec. & Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  5. Hale v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API