Legal Opinion

Koontz v. City of Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1972No. 76PublishedCited by 225 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

This Court has extensively considered the entry of summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of Chapter 1A-1 of the General Statutes in the cases of Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823, and Singleton v. Stewart, ante, 460, 186 S.E. 2d 400. We therefore briefly review the rules of law applicable to entry of summary judgment under that rule.

When there is a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, the court may consider evidence consisting of admissions in the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, admissions on file, oral…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Oliver v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Barker v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by225 opinions

  1. Dobson v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API