Legal Opinion

Rorrer v. Cooke

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1985No. 468PA84PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The sole issue before this Court is whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding summary judgment for defendant to be improper. For the reasons set forth below we conclude that it did and therefore reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. The rules governing summary judgment motions are now familiar and need not be repeated here. See Broadway v. Blythe Industries, Inc., 313 N.C. 150, 326 S.E. 2d 266 (1985); Bone International, Inc. v. Brooks, 304 N.C. 371, 375, 283 S.E. 2d 518, 520 (1981).

Plaintiffs suit is predicated upon the theory that Cooke negligently represented…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. In Re Watts and SachsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Lowe v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Waddle v. SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Kituskie v. CorbmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Davis v. Dennis Lilly Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Parish v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API