Legal Opinion

Hahne v. Hanzel

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 2003No. COA03-72PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

Lutz Hahne, Willie M. Easterwood, and Raymond Monroe (collectively, plaintiffs) appeal from entry of summary judgment in favor of John F. Hanzel (defendant) on their negligence claims arising from their purchases of certain stock. Because we conclude the doctrine of contributory negligence precludes any recovery by plaintiffs on these facts, we affirm.

On 26 January 2001, plaintiffs Easterwood and Monroe filed an action asserting claims against defendant and others for violation of state and federal securities law, legal malpractice, and negligence, all in connection with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Clark v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Piraino Bros. v. Atlantic Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Sims v. Graystone Ophthalmology Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. MCI Constructors, Inc. v. Hazen and Sawyer, PcDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
  4. Lamb v. D.S. Duggins Welding, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Drake v. AstiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API