Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Gardner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1993No. 285A92PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Justice.

This case presents the question whether a mother who is not present at the scene of a car accident in which her child is injured may recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) when she suffers mental anguish upon being informed of the accident, rushing to the hospital where she observes resuscitative efforts by emergency personnel upon her child, and later learning of her child’s death. We hold that because the pleadings and forecast of evidence fail to establish the reasonable foreseeability of her injury, she cannot, and we therefore reverse the decision…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Gates v. RichardsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. M.Y.B. Hospitality VenturesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Andersen v. BaccusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Sinning v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Stump v. Ashland, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Camp v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API