Legal Opinion
Kenneth L. Berry v. Watt W. Webb, William A. Wissler and William D. Forgeng
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 26, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8163PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal by Kenneth L. Berry from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority as to the subject matter in interference No. 93,724 to Watt W. Webb, William A. Wissler and William D. Forgeng (hereinafter Webb).
Berry, the senior party, is involved on application serial No. 696,595, filed November 15, 1957 and assigned to E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, and Webb on U. S. Patent No. 3,011,870, granted on an application filed September 5, 1958 and assigned to Union Carbide Corporation.
The invention in issue relates to new types of crystalline…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Searle v. GlarumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Allan Robert Andrew Beeber and Daniel S. Spechler v. Lester C. Krogh and Richard E. BrinkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Melvin D. Hurwitz v. George Shiu Yim PoonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Clinton W. MacMullen and Alfred Marzocchi v. Thomas R. Santelli, Thomas R. Santelli v. Clinton W. MacMullen and Alfred MarzocchiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Hahn v. WongCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Jean C. Kridl and Robert M. Goodman v. Francis P. McCormick Kenneth A. Barton, and William F. SwainCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Reese v. HurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- In re ReuterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.