Legal Opinion
Searle v. Glarum
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 2, 1950No. Patent Appeals 5632PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention to appellees.
The interference involves an application of appellees, No. 502,049, filed September 11, 1943, and the application of appellant, No. 607,497, filed July 27, 1945.
Three counts compose the issue. Count 1 is sufficiently illustrative and is reproduced as follows:
1. Quaternary ammonium compounds of the formula
-wherein R is an alkyl group containing at least 8 and not more than 18 carbon atoms.
The invention relates to certain new…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farrington v. MikeskaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Collins v. OlsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Thurston v. WulffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Electro-Metallurgical Co. v. Krupp Nirosta Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Senkus v. JohnstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kenneth L. Berry v. Watt W. Webb, William A. Wissler and William D. ForgengCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- James L. Gianladis v. Gus S. KassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.