Legal Opinion
Hahn v. Wong
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 28, 1989No. 89-1364PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) that entered summary judgment in an interference because in his initial filing, the party who initiated the interference had not made a prima facie showing of reduction to practice. The Board also refused to consider the additional evidence the party subsequently submitted to bolster his claim because he had not shown good cause why he had not submitted the additional evidence with his original application. We affirm both rulings…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reese v. HurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Kenneth L. Berry v. Watt W. Webb, William A. Wissler and William D. ForgengCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Oka v. YoussefyehCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Berges v. GottsteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- Mikus v. WachtelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Peter B. Cooper v. David GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- In Re Kuriappan P. Alappat, Edward E. Averill and James G. LarsenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.