In re Reuter
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Appeals (“board”) which affirmed the examiner’s rejections of claims 1 and 3-11 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Everett1 in view of Berckmuller2 and claims 2 and 12 over Everett in view of Berckmuller and Barish 3 in reissue application serial No. 887,103, filed March 16, 1978, for “Flexible Gliding Wing.” The board stated that its decision was reinforced by an affidavit of Poynter and a deposition of Vickery. We affirm.
Procedural History
Appellants’ assignee, Pioneer Parachute Company,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Woodland Trust v. Flowertree Nursery, Inc. And Ivy J. WinslettCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Sandt Technology, Ltd. v. Resco Metal and Plastics Corporation (Also Known as Resco Metal Products Corp.) and Seven Ocean Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc., Unique Beverage Dispensers, Inc., David Fox, and Bruce BurwickCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.