Legal Opinion
Reese v. Hurst
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided October 15, 1981No. Appeal Nos. 81-525 to 81-527PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
These consolidated appeals from the decisions of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Interferences (“board”) involve three separate parties and three separate interferences: (1) a continuatión-inpart application of Stanton L. Reese and Herbert M. Katz (“Reese”) filed December 2, 1970, Serial No. 94,594, and their parent application, Serial No. 882,808, filed December 5,1969. These applications are assigned to Uranium Recovery Corporation (“URC”); (2) A reissue application of Fred J. Hurst and David J. Crouse (“Hurst”) filed January 9, 1974, Reissue Serial No.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ivar Jepson v. Robert E. Coleman, Jr., and Calvin D. MacCrackenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Kenneth L. Berry v. Watt W. Webb, William A. Wissler and William D. ForgengCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Fontijn v. OkamotoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- James A. Patterson and Glenn K. Lissner v. Karl-Heinz HauckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- William S. Gubelmann, Deceased, by Walter S. Gubelmann v. Herman GangCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Peter B. Cooper v. David GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.