Legal Opinion
Allan Robert Andrew Beeber and Daniel S. Spechler v. Lester C. Krogh and Richard E. Brink
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 6, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8005PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to Krogh and Brink in Interference No. 92,283, into which Interference No. 92,284 has been consolidated. 1 The three counts in issue correspond to claims 5, 1 and 2, respectively, of U. S. Patent No. 2,893,896, granted to Beeber and Spechler on July 7, 1959 on application Serial No. 656,513, filed May 2, 1957. The appellees, Krogh and Brink, are involved on the basis of claims constituting modifications of the aforementioned patent claims which they copied in their application Serial No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James A. Patterson and Glenn K. Lissner v. Karl-Heinz HauckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- James L. Gianladis v. Gus S. KassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Collins v. OlsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Vandenberg v. ReynoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Amax Fly Ash Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Kenneth L. Berry v. Watt W. Webb, William A. Wissler and William D. ForgengCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- In re ReuterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Mikus v. WachtelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In re ReuterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.