Legal Opinion

City of Stockton v. Bascou

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1970No. Civ. 12386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAY, J. *

Appellant Lucien Bascou appeals from a court judgment (jury waived) denying recovery for the value of industrial equipment on property involved in this condemnation action.

Question Presented

The date of service of summons is the proper date for determining appellant’s interest in the equipment involved herein and the date of trial of the action is the proper date of determination of its value.

Facts

In February 1956 defendant Bernice L. Ritchie leased to appellant Lucien Bascou certain premises in Stockton for a term of three years, with the right to remove the equipment.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Concrete Service Co. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Redevelopment Agency v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. City of Los Angeles v. TowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Redevelopment Agency of Stockton v. Diamond PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Simon Newman Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Concrete Service Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API