Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Andrews

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1921No. Civ. No. 3528PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an action for the condemnation of real property under the right of eminent domain. Plaintiff had judgment and defendant Harbor Lumber Company appeals.

On May 27, 1916, The Long Beach Savings & Trust Company entered into a writing with Clark Horsford, the trust company being the owner of the property sought to be con demned and in which, appellant claims an interest, and Horsford acting as the agent of appellant. On account of Horsford’s peculiar manner of executing the document, which appears below, it is to be remarked that both parties signed it the same day. The instrument, in its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Menzel v. PrimmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Johnson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Phillips Petroleum Company v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  3. County of Santa Clara v. CurtnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API