Concrete Service Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Works
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DEVINE, P. J.
In an earlier appeal from a judgment in inverse condemnation, plaintiff was held to have a compensable interest in improvements, equipment and machinery located on the taken land. (Concrete Service Co. v. State of California ex rel. Dept. Pub. Wks., 274 Cal.App.2d 142 [78 Cal.Rptr. 923].) On remand, the trial court held that appellant was entitled only to the removal value of its property, a concrete batch plant. It was stipulated that the removal value was zero.
Concrete installed its plant in 1950 on land owned by Galli. It held a five-year, and later a ten-year, lease,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Lynbar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Concrete Service Co. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Redevelopment Agency of Stockton v. Diamond PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lanning v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- County of Ventura v. Channel Islands Marina, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- County of Ventura v. Channel Islands Marina, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008