Legal Opinion

Concrete Service Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Works

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1972No. Civ. 30518PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DEVINE, P. J.

In an earlier appeal from a judgment in inverse condemnation, plaintiff was held to have a compensable interest in improvements, equipment and machinery located on the taken land. (Concrete Service Co. v. State of California ex rel. Dept. Pub. Wks., 274 Cal.App.2d 142 [78 Cal.Rptr. 923].) On remand, the trial court held that appellant was entitled only to the removal value of its property, a concrete batch plant. It was stipulated that the removal value was zero.

Concrete installed its plant in 1950 on land owned by Galli. It held a five-year, and later a ten-year, lease,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Lynbar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Concrete Service Co. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Redevelopment Agency of Stockton v. Diamond PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lanning v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. County of Ventura v. Channel Islands Marina, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. County of Ventura v. Channel Islands Marina, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API