Redevelopment Agency v. Maxwell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
Plaintiff appeals from judgment entered in an eminent domain proceeding. Defendant’s property is being taken for a redevelopment project in the section of San Francisco known as the Western Addition. Her lot is 100 feet by 40 feet. On it are three buildings, each 33% feet wide, and each containing three flats.
Summons was issued June 12, 1959. Although the case went to trial slightly more than a year after the issuance of summons, it was stipulated that this delay should not affect the statutory valuation date (Code Civ. Proe., § 1249). It is conceded that no right of immediate possession was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Jefferson County v. AdwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MurataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- In re PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1913
- Farmer v. Town of HooksettSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1854
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Escondido Union School District v. Casa Sueños De Oro, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Krone v. GoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Saratoga Fire Protection District v. HackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.