Legal Opinion

Redevelopment Agency v. Maxwell

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1961No. Civ. 19685PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

Plaintiff appeals from judgment entered in an eminent domain proceeding. Defendant’s property is being taken for a redevelopment project in the section of San Francisco known as the Western Addition. Her lot is 100 feet by 40 feet. On it are three buildings, each 33% feet wide, and each containing three flats.

Summons was issued June 12, 1959. Although the case went to trial slightly more than a year after the issuance of summons, it was stipulated that this delay should not affect the statutory valuation date (Code Civ. Proe., § 1249). It is conceded that no right of immediate possession was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Jefferson County v. AdwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MurataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In re PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Farmer v. Town of HooksettSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Escondido Union School District v. Casa Sueños De Oro, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Krone v. GoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Saratoga Fire Protection District v. HackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API