Legal Opinion

Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 20, 2022No. 3:19-cv-07270Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 URSULA FREITAS and JAMIE POSTPICHAL, 11 No. C 19-7270 WHA Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL CRICKET WIRELESS, LLC, ARBITRATION 14 Defendant. 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 In this RICO class action, defendant moves to compel arbitration of class members’ 18 claims. This order will not order any absent class members to arbitrate, but it will modify the 19 class definition in light of the issues raised. 20 STATEMENT 21 Plaintiffs Ursula Freitas and Jamie Postpichal claim that defendant, Cricket Wireless, 22…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Paulsen v. CNF INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API