Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Agency of Stockton v. Diamond Properties
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1969No. Civ. 1017PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Diamond Properties appeals from a judgment in an eminent domain action wherein it was determined that appellant had no compensable interest in property condemned by respondent, Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockton.
On November 16, 1960, respondent gave notice to the owners and occupants of property in a nine-block area in Stockton that it intended to acquire the property by purchase or condemnation. At that time appellant was operating a meat processing plant on part of the property within the designated redevelopment area. Originally appellant’s tenancy was pursuant to a 10-year…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. KlopstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Los Angeles v. Allen's Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- El Monte School District v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. HartleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- City of Los Angeles v. SiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
3Cited by12 opinions
- Superior Strut & Hanger Co. v. Port of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Concrete Service Co. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Lanning v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- City of Industry v. WilleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Pacific Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City of BurbankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.