Legal Opinion
Claim of Jakeway v. John F. Bauer Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 11, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, J.
That the claimant received serious accidental injuries on October 19, 1925, is not questioned. The objection to the award is that these accidental injuries were not sustained in the course of, and did not arise out of, her employment.
The employer was a manufacturer of cereal coffee. The claimant is called a traveling saleswoman. It appears that she traveled through a number of States, visiting State and county institutions, principally hospitals, and attending conventions apparently of the officers and superintendents of such institutions. Her employer’s place of business was in Elmira, N. Y.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Matter of Davidson v. Pansy Waist CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of McCarter v. LarockNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Claim of Harby v. Marwell Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Claim of Kass v. Hirschberg, Schutz & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gibbs Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Claim of Theyken v. Diplomat Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Fisher v. Mossman-Yarnelle Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938
- Claim of Craciola v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Breland & Whitten v. BrelandMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.